HOW MUCH OF A CONCERN ARE GLOBAL TECH WOES FOR IRELAND
Article appeared in Irish Examiner January 9th 2023
Over the Christmas holiday period the ‘new’ Taoiseach made strong commitments in relation to social and economic issues in areas such as child poverty, housing, and health. The one thing these commitments have in common is that the solutions will have to involve extra government expenditure. For the mandarins in the Department of Finance and the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform such political commitments most probably give cause for deep concern. They are unlikely to subscribe to the concept of the ‘money tree’ and Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), which argues that expenditure and borrowing do not matter. In an environment where government borrowing costs and general interest rates are rising, borrowing does matter. Witness what happened in the UK in October after Kwasi Kwarteng introduced his barmy mini budget.
On Wednesday last the Department of Finance published its end-year Exchequer returns, and on the surface at least, they made for pleasant viewing. The Exchequer delivered a surplus of €5 billion in 2022, which translates into a General Government Surplus of €5.2 billion (this is the preferred EU measure of the public finances). Central to this excellent performance was an incredibly strong corporation tax performance. The Exchequer collected €22.6 billion under this tax heading, which is €7.3 billion or 47.8 per cent higher than 2021. As was the case throughout 2022 as the monthly take on the corporation tax front set new records, the Department officials sought to downplay its significance. Their fear is that much of this tax take could be transitory and are fearful of history repeating itself. The history I refer to is the excessive government spending that accompanied the surge in property-related taxes in the first half of the noughties. When this tax-take collapsed, the fiscal results were disastrous.
Last week, the Department adjusted the Exchequer figures for its assessment of the transitory element of corporation tax receipts. It concluded that the underlying General Government Balance (GGB*) is estimated to have been in deficit to the tune of €5.25 billion. In other words, around €10 billion of the corporation tax take is categorised as vulnerable. Who knows? But any sensible person would recognise that the Department is right to be cautious.
The growth in corporation tax receipts reflects the profitability of the multi-national companies who pay tax in Ireland. The risk now is that as those profits deteriorate, the tax paid is also likely to deteriorate. The omens for the global technology sector are not looking promising in that regard. We got two further warnings last week.
Amazon announced that it is going to lay off 18,000 employees from its global workforce, up from an initial announcement of 10,000 in November. Salesforce announced plans to lay off 10 per cent of its global workforce, including business closures, by the end of 2024. These are not unique occurrences.
During the pandemic, online business boomed and technology companies expanded their workforces accordingly. Now that online business has started to normalise, and more pertinently, now that the global economic environment has deteriorated markedly, many of those companies quite simply have too many employees and with revenues under pressure, a labour force adjustment is inevitable. Nothing strange here as it is typically what happens during the business cycle, but the cycle is currently more pronounced for technology companies, broadly defined.
It seems certain that the global tech sector will experience a decline in profits over the coming year. This is likely to undermine corporation tax paid in Ireland but could also have implications for employment in the sector.
At the end of 2022, ICT companies supported by the IDA employed 116,192 employees, equivalent to 38.5 per cent of total employment supported by the IDA. Jobs will inevitably be lost, but it is reassuring that outside of the big names, there would still appear to be demand for labour in this space. Of even more consolation for Ireland is the significant role played by the Chemical and Pharmaceutical sector. Companies supported by the IDA employ an estimated 105,000 people and in the first ten months of last year, accounted for just under 65 per cent of total merchandise exports. This sector is characterised by heavy investment, not least in concrete, and as such it has deeper roots in the economy than technology companies, who typically tend to have a much more volatile existence.
We will need to observe global technology woes carefully, but the current difficulties in the sector are not unprecedented after a period of such rapid expansion. Ireland just needs to remain focused on preserving its favoured status as a location for mobile investment.
Your comments regarding MMT and the ‘magic money tree’ seem somewhat out of place given the general balanced review of the article.
It is clear that you and governments in general do not understand money and it’s role in the economy.
The issue is not whether there is enough money or not. The issue is whether on the one hand the extra government expenditure is improving well being and targeting the sectors with spare resources. Or, on the other hand, whether the extra debt can be reasonably financed.
The assessment of the government’s plans should involve a year-by-year projection of the economy under different scenarios. These scenarios should assess both real returns to the economy and the risks associated with them. The choice between them is a political one.